Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Investec Australia Finance Pty Limited v Naude [2016] FCA 731 File number: NSD 1040 of 2014
Judge: FARRELL J
Date of judgment: 20 June 2016
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – application for sequestration order – where creditor's petition dated 13 October 2014 relied on debtor's failure to comply with a bankruptcy notice which relied on a judgment debt – where applicant purports to be assignee of the judgment debt – where notice of assignment relates to only one of two amounts comprised in the judgment debt – where further deed of assignment executed in relation to the judgment debt – where applicant sought leave to withdraw creditor's petition dated 13 October 2014 pursuant to s 47(2) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) and to file a petition relying on a different act of bankruptcy being the execution by the debtor of an authority under s 188 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) on 25 November 2014 – where registrar made orders on 28 April 2015 granting leave to withdraw the petition and to file an amended creditor's petition – where applicant's "clean" petition rejected by registry – where applicant subsequently filed a creditor's petition dated 4 May 2015 containing marked-up changes from the original petition – where lodgement receipt issued on 5 May 2015 – whether in these circumstances the petition containing marked up amendments was "presented" within the meaning of s 44(1)(c) on 5 May 2015 – whether act of bankruptcy relied on occurred within six months before presentation of the creditor's petition for the purposes of s 44(1)(c) – whether creditor's petition has lapsed – where registrar made order on 9 October 2015 extending period before which the creditor's petition lapses to a period of 24 months without nominating the date on which the period commenced BANKRUPTCY – whether applicant was a creditor of the respondent as at 5 May 2015 – where applicant purports to be an assignee of the judgment debt – where no evidence of date on which notice of assignment of debt given to respondent debtor – where creditor's petition dated 4 May 2015 relied on execution of an authority under s 188 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – consideration of the relevance of r 39.1(a) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) which prohibits the issue of a writ of execution in respect of a judgment debt that has been assigned without the leave of the court BANKRUPTCY – whether grounds in notice of opposition made out – whether applicant possesses secured property of the respondent debtor – where applicant or its holding company is mortgagee in possession of properties owned by companies associated with the respondent debtor – whether "offsets" available against the judgment debt – whether appropriate to go behind the judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate