Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Long v Comcare [2016] FCA 737 File number: TAD 8 of 2015
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 22 June 2016
Catchwords: WORKERS' COMPENSATION – appeal from a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming a decision to reject the employee's claim for compensation for psychiatric injury – where quality assurance procedure imposed on employee found to be significant contributing factor to onset of psychiatric injury – whether quality assurance procedure constituted "administrative action…in respect of the employee's employment" within the meaning of s 5A of the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth)
Legislation: Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) ss 5A, 5B, 14 Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 43, 43(2B)
Cases cited: Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Reeve (2012) 199 FCR 463 – applied Repatriation Commission v O'Brien (1985) 155 CLR 422 –cited
Date of hearing: 6 June 2016
Registry: Tasmania
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 38
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr B McTaggart SC
Solicitor for the Appellant: Ogilvie Jennings
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr C Hobbs
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
ORDERS TAD 8 of 2015
BETWEEN: CHRISTINE LONG Appellant
AND: COMCARE Respondent
JUDGE: TRACEY J DATE OF ORDER: 22 June 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dimissed. 2. The appellant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate