Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Valve Corporation (No 5) [2016] FCA 741 File number: NSD 886 of 2014
Judge: EDELMAN J
Date of judgment: 27 June 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – confidentiality orders – appropriateness of orders to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice – general allegations of commercially sensitive and confidential information – information not provided to the other party or the court – publicly available information relating to the alleged confidential information – need for transparent, open justice
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 75, 135(a), 135(b) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37AE, 37AF, 37AG(1)(a), 37AJ(2), 50 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 2.32
Cases cited: Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Origin Energy Electricity Ltd [2015] FCA 278 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 3) [2012] FCA 1430 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Ltd (No 12) [2013] FCA 533 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cement Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 1082 Computer Interchange Pty Ltd v Microsoft Corp [1999] FCA 198; (1999) 88 FCR 438 Hearne v Street [2008] HCA 36; (2008) 235 CLR 125 Hogan v Australian Crime Commission [2009] FCAFC 71; (2009) 177 FCR 205 Hogan v Australian Crime Commission [2010] HCA 21; (2010) 240 CLR 651 Yara Australia Pty Ltd v Burrup Holdings Limited (No 2) [2010] FCA 1304
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate