Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Stevens v Camille (No 2) [2016] FCA 748 File number: WAD 1 of 2015
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 24 June 2016
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – application for leave to bring proceedings on behalf of Aboriginal Corporation under s 169-1 of the Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act 2006 (Cth) – whether requirements in s 169-5 satisfied – whether applicants acting in good faith – whether in best interests of the Aboriginal Corporation – whether serious question to be tried – application dismissed
Legislation: Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act 2006 (Cth) ss 246-5, 246-5(5), 169-1, 169-1(1), 169-5, 576-1, 694-85 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 1318 Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
Cases cited: Coeur De Lion Investments Pty Ltd v Kelly [2014] 1 Qd R 296; [2013] QCA 160 Gaertner v Dharah Gibinj Aboriginal Medical Service Aboriginal Corporation [2013] FCA 1330 Re The President's Club Limited; Coeur De Lion Investments Pty Limited v Kelly & Ors [2012] QSC 364 Stevens v Wintawari Guruma Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC [2016] FCA 149 Suh & Ors v Cho & Ors [2013] VSC 491 Swansson v RA Pratt Properties Pty Ltd and Another (2002) 42 ACSR 313; [2002] NSWSC 583 Vinciguerra v MG Corrosion Consultants Pty Ltd (ACN 084 715 177) (2010) 79 ACSR 293; [2010] FCA 763
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate