Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZUAW v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 767 Appeal from: SZUAW v Minister for Immigration [2016] FCCA 264
File number: NSD 249 of 2016
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 24 May 2016
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36(2)(a), s36(2)(aa), 36(2A)
Cases cited: SZSGA v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship (2013) FCA 774 SZTDT v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 631
Date of hearing: 24 May 2016
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 34
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant appeared in person
Counsel for the First Respondent: Ms C Hillary
Solicitor for the First Respondent: DLA Piper Australia
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The second respondent filed a submitting notice
ORDERS NSD 249 of 2016
BETWEEN: SZUAW Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: RARES J DATE OF ORDER: 24 MAY 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(REVISED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT) RARES J: 1 This is an appeal from the decision of the Federal Circuit Court refusing to grant the appellant Constitutional writ relief in respect of the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal given on 17 February 2014 to affirm the Minister's delegate's decision not to grant the appellant a protection visa: SZUAW v Minister for Immigration [2016] FCCA 264.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate