Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Safe is Safe Pty Ltd v Royal National Agricultural and Industrial Association of Queensland [2016] FCA 770 File number(s): NSD 974 of 2016
Judge(s): JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 29 June 2016
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – application for interlocutory relief – whether the respondent should be restrained from communicating to amusement device owners and operators that it will not accept safety inspection certificates from the applicants – where charges remain pending against the applicants under the Work Health and Safety Act 2012 (SA)
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law (Cth) ss 18, 45, 46 Royal National Agricultural and Industrial Association of Queensland Act 1971 (Qld) Work Health and Safety Act 2012 (SA) Work Health and Safety Regulation 2011 (Qld) s 241(5)(b)
Date of hearing: 29 June 2016
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 28
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr G Hatcher SC
Solicitor for the Applicants: Anderson Fredericks Turner Lawyers & Advocates
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr R M Derrington QC
Solicitor for the Respondent: Minter Ellison
ORDERS NSD 974 of 2016
BETWEEN: SAFE IS SAFE PTY LTD (ACN 159 668 505) First Applicant
HAMISH GRANT MUNRO Second Applicant
AND: ROYAL NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL AND INDUSTRIAL ASSOCIATION OF QUEENSLAND Respondent
JUDGE: JAGOT J DATE OF ORDER: 30 JUNE 2016
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate