Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rakic v Johns Lyng Insurance Building Solutions (Victoria) Pty Ltd (Trustee) (No 2) [2016] FCA 783 File number: VID 230 of 2014
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 5 July 2016
Catchwords: COSTS – claim commenced April 2014 – in August 2014 applicant made offer of settlement under Pt 25 Federal Court Rules– applicant amended statement of claim in July 2015 – proceeding ultimately involved claim under Australian Consumer Law, debt claim, and seeking of declaration in relation to a novated lease – applicant succeeded in relation to ACL claim, failed in relation to lease issue, and succeeded in debt claim but on basis not advanced by her – consideration of apportionment of costs of particular claims – applicant denied 10 per cent of costs due to failure on lease issue and due to having not advanced correct argument in debt claim – indemnity costs – consideration and discussion of whether and when amendment of claim provides proper basis for departure from r 25.14(3) – amendment of claim did not provide proper basis – indemnity costs awarded from August 2014
Legislation: District Court Rules 1973 (NSW) Pt 39A r 25(1B) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 25.14 Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) O 23 r 11
Cases cited: Ainger v Coffs Harbour City Council (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 212 Bowen Investments Pty Ltd v Tabcorp Holdings Ltd (No 2) [2008] FCAFC 107 Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 Castro v Hillery [2003] 1 Qd R 651 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker (2014) 253 CLR 169 Cretazzo v Lombardi (1975) 13 SASR 4 Dimento v Dimento (Costs) [2007] NSWSC 1233 Dodds Family Investments Pty Ltd v Lane Industries Pty Ltd (1993) 26 IPR 261 Donnelly v Johnson [1999] FCA 1875 Firebird Global Master Fund II Ltd v Republic of Nauru (No 2) (2015) 90 ALJR 270 Fowdh v Fowdh [1993] NSWCA 100 Futuretronics.com.au Pty Ltd v Graphix Labels Pty Ltd [2009] FCAFC 40 Hockey v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 2) (2015) 237 FCR 127 James v Surf Road Nominees Pty Ltd (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 296 Kassem v Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2012] FCA 293 Kimche v Commissioner of Taxation [2005] FCA 293 Les Laboratoires Servier v Apotex Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 27 Malick v Lloyd (1913) 16 CLR 483 Management 3 Group Pty Ltd (In Liq) v Lenny's Commercial Kitchens Pty Ltd (No 2) (2012) 203 FCR 283 Merost Pty Ltd v CPT Custodian Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 594 Metz Holdings Pty Ltd v Simmac Pty Ltd (No 3) [2011] FCA 1450 Miletich v Murchie [2012] FCA 1013 Morgan v Johnson (1998) 44 NSWLR 578 Moss v Lowe Hunt & Partners Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1181 Norris v Blake (No 2) (1997) 41 NSWLR 49 Port Stephens Shire Council v Tellamist Pty Ltd (No 2) [2004] NSWCA 415 Rakic v Johns Lyng Building Solutions (Victoria) Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 430 Robinson v Kenny (No 2) [2015] FCA 2 Rolls Royce Industrial Power (Pacific) Ltd v James Hardie and Coy Pty Ltd (2001) 53 NSWLR 626 Rutter v Brookland Valley Estate Pty Limited [2009] FCA 702 Shaw v Jarldorn (1999) 76 SASR 28 Simonton v Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (No 2) [2008] FCAFC 113 Skyy Spirits LLC v Lodestar Anstalt (No 2) [2015] FCA 575 Smith v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [1997] FCA 945 Specsavers Pty Ltd v The Optical Superstore Pty Ltd (No 4) [2012] FCA 652 Waters v PC Henderson (Australia) Pty Ltd (1994) 254 ALR 328 Whiting v Somerset Regional Council (No 2) [2010] QSC 329 G E Dal Pont, Law of Costs (3rd. ed., LexisNexis Butterworths)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate