Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Shaw v Buljan [2016] FCA 829 File number(s): VID 727 of 2016
Judge(s): CHARLESWORTH J
Date of judgment: 21 July 2016
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for review of a decision made by a Registrar of the Federal Court of Australia – where Registrar refused to accept a proposed interlocutory application for filing – whether Registrar complied with obligation to give reasons – whether Registrar complied with the rules of natural justice – whether Registrar took into account irrelevant considerations –whether Registrar failed to identify utility in the relief sought. HIGH COURT AND FEDERAL COURT – jurisdiction of Federal Court of Australia to restrain solicitors from acting for a party – nature of jurisdiction
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), ss 3, 5, 6, 11, 13, 16 Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 153B Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth), ss 20A, 24, 25 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 2.25, 2.26, 31.01 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B
Cases cited: Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 Australian Institute of Marine and Power Engineers v Secretary, Department of Transport (1986) 13 FCR 124 Dealer Support Services Pty Ltd v Motor Trades Association of Australia Ltd [2014] FCA 1065, (2014) 228 FCR 252 Fonterra Brands (Australia) Pty Ltd v Viropoulos [2013] FCA657, (2013) 304 ALR 332 Geelong School Supplies Pty Ltd v Dean [2006] FCA 1404, (2006) 237 ALR 612 Grimwade v Meagher [1995] 1 VR 446 Jackson v Sterling Industries Ltd (1987) 162 CLR 612 Lamb v Moss (1983) 76 FLR 296 Lee v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 159 FCR 181 McVeigh v Willara Pty Ltd (1984) 6 FCR 587 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Ethic Affairs v Taveli (1990) 23 FCR 162 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Police Federation of Australia v Nixon (2011) 198 FCR 267, [2011] FCAFC 161 Public Service Board of New South Wales v Osmond (1986) 159 CLR 656 R v Civil Service Appeal Board; Ex parte Cunningham [1991] 4 All ER 310 R v Forbes; Ex Parte Bevan (1972) 127 CLR 1 R v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Ex parte Doody [1994] 1 AC 531 Rahman v Hedge [2012] FCA 68 Satchithanantham v National Australia Bank Limited (2010) 268 ALR 222; [2010] FCAFC 47 Shaw v MAB Corporation Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 1231 Shaw v MAB Corporation Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 62, (2014) 220 FCR 425. Shaw v Yarranova Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 88 Western Australia v Ward (1997) 76 FCR 492; [1997] FCA 585 Yarranova Pty Ltd v Shaw (No 2) [2014] FCA 616
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate