Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Investec Australia Finance Pty Limited v Naude (No 2) [2016] FCA 835 File number: NSD 1040 of 2014
Judge: FARRELL J
Date of judgment: 22 July 2016
Catchwords: COSTS – creditor's petition – original petition withdrawn with leave of the Court – new petition filed – applicant successful on second petition – appropriateness of a costs order in respect of the entire proceedings – costs limited to the date of presentation of the second creditor's petition
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 109(1)(a) Bankruptcy Regulations 1996 (Cth) reg 6.01(1), Sch 3 Federal Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 2016 (Cth) r 13.01(1) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Pt 40
Cases cited: Investec Australia Finance Pty Limited v Naude [2016] FCA 731
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Date of last submission: 30 June 2016
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 4
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr D Sulan
Solicitor for the Applicant: Arnold Bloch Leibler
Counsel for the Respondent: The respondent did not file written submissions
ORDERS NSD 1040 of 2014
BETWEEN: INVESTEC AUSTRALIA FINANCE PTY LIMITED Applicant
AND: ALFRED NAUDE Respondent
JUDGE: FARRELL J DATE OF ORDER: 22 JULY 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The petitioning creditor's costs in respect of the presentation of and conduct of proceedings upon the 4 May 2015 Creditor's Petition, be taxed and paid from the respondent debtor's estate. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate