Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hughes on behalf of the Eastern Guruma People v State of Western Australia (No 3) [2016] FCA 840 Appeal from: TJ on (behalf of the Yindjibarndi People) v State of Western Australia [2016] FCA 553
File number(s): WAD 225 of 2016 WAD 226 of 2016
Judge: GILMOUR
Date of judgment: 25 July 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal from interlocutory decision summarily dismissing an application for a native title determination as an abuse of process and further under s 31A(2) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – whether leave to appeal may be refused where the decision has the practical effect of finally determining a party's claim to native title PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – summary dismissal - abuse of process – whether primary judge erred in his consideration of requirement for proof of native title – consideration of "spiritual connection" – whether merely an evidentiary analysis – whether finding of relevant prejudice unreasonable and illogical – whether irrelevant considerations taken into account COSTS – application for leave to appeal from an individual costs order against the applicant upon the dismissal of his application for joinder – application for leave to appeal from order that the individual applicant pay the costs thrown away for reasons including the lodgement of a claim, by a native title claim group
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 24(1A), 24(1D), 31A(2), 31A(3) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 26.01 Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 13, 61(1), 61(5), 62(1)(b), 62(2)(d)-(f), 67, 84(5), 223, 223(1)(b), 235, 251B
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate