Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AMU15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 841 Appeal from: AMU15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCCA 2312
File number: NTD 56 of 2015
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 16 February 2016
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Cases cited: AMU15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCCA 2312 Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 211 CLR 476
Date of hearing: 25 November 2015
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 46
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondents: Z Kent
Solicitor for the Respondents: Australian Government Solicitor
ORDERS NTD 56 of 2015
BETWEEN: AMU15 Appellant AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J DATE OF ORDER: 16 February 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay to the first respondent costs of the appeal to be taxed or agreed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
MANSFIELD J 1 The appellant appealed from a judgment of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia delivered on 25 August 2015: AMU15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCCA 2312. That Court dismissed an application for judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal, now the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (the Tribunal). The Tribunal had affirmed a decision of a delegate of the Minister to refuse to grant to the appellant a Protection (Class XA visa) (the visa) under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate