Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Britax Childcare Pty Ltd, in the matter of Infa Products Pty Ltd v Infa Products Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) [2016] FCA 848 File number: NSD 410 of 2016
Judge: BURLEY J
Date of judgment: 28 July 2016
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – application to set aside Deed of Company Arrangement under s 445D of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – whether creditors will suffer prejudice if Deed of Company Arrangement set aside – whether dominant creditor can set aside a Deed of Company Arrangement if it will not prejudice the other creditors – whether administrators failed to consider claims for breach of duty against director – whether administrators failed to consider claims against related parties – whether discretion should be exercised in setting aside the Deed of Company Arrangement – public interest in investigating company's transactions in liquidation CORPORATIONS – application to set aside resolution of creditors under s 600B of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – whether casting vote in favour of resolution was made conscientiously and by reference to all relevant considerations
Legislation: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 37A Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), Pt 5.3A, ss 79, 181, 435A, 436E, 439A, 445D, 588FB, 588FC, 588FE, 600A, 600B Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), Div 7A Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth), 5.6.21 Corporate Law Reform Bill 1992 (Cth) Explanatory Memorandum, Corporate Law Reform Bill (Cth) 1992
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate