Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZVRM v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 919 Appeal from: SZVRM v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection and Anor [2016] FCCA 639
File number: NSD 444 of 2016
Judge: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 11 August 2016
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 424AA
Cases cited: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Singh (2014) 231 FCR 437 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIAI (2009) 259 ALR 429
Date of hearing: 2 August 2016
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 36
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant appeared in person
Solicitor for the Respondents: Mr J Pinder, Minter Ellison Lawyers
ORDERS NSD 444 of 2016
BETWEEN: SZVRM Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: MARKOVIC J DATE OF ORDER: 11 AUGUST 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
MARKOVIC J:
introduction 1 The appellant is a citizen of Bangladesh. He appeals from orders made and judgment given by the Federal Circuit Court of Australia (Federal Circuit Court) on 14 March 2016 dismissing an application for judicial review of a decision of the second respondent (the Tribunal) dated 23 October 2014: see SZVRM v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection and Anor [2016] FCCA 639 (SZVRM). The Tribunal had affirmed a decision of a delegate of the first respondent (the Minister) not to grant the appellant a protection visa. 2 The appellant arrived in Australia in 2008 as the holder of a student visa. He lodged an application for a further student visa which was refused. In March 2013 he withdrew his application for review of that decision. 3 On 12 March 2013 the appellant applied for a Protection (Class XA) visa (the Visa). On 26 September 2014 a delegate of the Minister refused to grant the Visa. 4 On 29 October 2013 the appellant applied to the Tribunal (which was then the Refugee Review Tribunal) for review of the delegate's decision. On 23 October 2014 the Tribunal affirmed the decision not to grant the appellant the Visa.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate