Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BGR15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 920 Appeal from: BGR15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection & Anor [2015] FCCA 2849
File number: NSD 1518 of 2015
Judge: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 10 August 2016
Catchwords: MIGRATION – whether the Tribunal fell into jurisdictional error by failing to consider whether the appellant would suffer 'significant harm' for a Convention related reason if the applicant returned to his home country and continued to pursue two forms of activity which he said he had pursued in the past – whether there was a substantial, clearly articulated argument relying upon established facts – whether the Tribunal satisfied the requirement of considering the claims of the applicant – relevance of professional assistance in the presentation of claims to the Tribunal and Federal Circuit Court
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 425(1)
Cases cited: Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 236 FCR 593 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2003) 197 ALR 389 Htun v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 233 FCR 136 MZWDG v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 497 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2004) 144 FCR 1 SZSHK v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCAFC 125
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate