Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dick Smith Investments Pty Ltd v Ramsey [2016] FCA 939 File number: NSD 272 of 2014
Judge: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 12 August 2016
Catchwords: TRADE MARKS — Appeal from decision of a delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks to remove trade mark from the Register for non-use — whether use of trade mark in the non-use period when there was no sale of the goods in respect of which the trade mark was registered — whether there was an obstacle to the use of the trade mark in the non-use period within s 100(3)(c) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) — whether reasonable to order that the trade mark not be removed pursuant to s 101(3) of the Act
Legislation: Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) ss 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 17, 44(3)(b), 92(4)(b), 100(1)(c), 100(3)(c), 101(3) Trade Marks Act 1955 (Cth)
Cases cited: Aristoc Ltd v Rysta Ltd [1945] AC 68 Austin Nichols & Co Inc v Lodestar Anstalt (2011) 202 FCR 462 Austin Nichols & Co Inc v Lodestar Anstalt (No 1) (2012) 202 FCR 490 Buying Systems (Australia) Pty Ltd v Studio SRL (1995) 30 IPR 517; [1995] AIPC 91–119 Coca-Cola Co v All-Fect Distributors Ltd (1999) 96 FCR 107 Conquip Holdings Pty Ltd v S & A Restaurant Corporation [2000] AIPC 91–547; [2000] FCA 256 Continental Liqueurs Pty Ltd v GF Heublein and Bro. Inc. (1960) 103 CLR 422 Dick Smith Investments Pty Ltd v Roger Ramsey (2006) 70 IPR 428; [2006] ATMO 82 Dick Smith Investments Pty Ltd v Ramsey (2014) 105 IPR 452; [2014] ATMO 16 E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 144 E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Ltd (2008) 77 IPR 69; [2008] FCA 934 Estex Clothing Manufacturers Pty Limited v Ellis and Goldstein Limited (1967) 116 CLR 254 Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network, GP [2009] FCA 68 Hermes Trade Mark [1982] RPC 425 Jackson & Co v Napper (1886) 35 Ch D 162 Kowa Company Ltd v NV Organon (2005) 66 IPR 131; [2005] FCA 1282 Liquideng Farm Supplies Pty Ltd v Liquid Engineering 2003 Pty Ltd (2009) 175 FCR 26 Lomas v Winton Shire Council [2002] FCAFC 413 McAndrew v Bassett (1864) 4 DJ&S 380 McCormick & Company Inc v McCormick (2000) 51 IPR 102; [2000] FCA 1335 Moorgate Tobacco Co Limited v Philip Morris Ltd (No 2) (1984) 156 CLR 414 New South Wales Dairy Corporation v Murray Goulburn Co-Operative Company Ltd (1989) 86 ALR 549; 14 IPR 26 Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Ltd v Pioneer KK (2009) 176 FCR 300 Pioneer Kabushiki Kaisha v Registrar of Trade Marks (1977) 137 CLR 670 QH Tours Ltd v Mark Travel Corporation (1999) 45 IPR 553 Re Nodoz Trade Mark [1962] RPC 1 Ritz Hotel Ltd v Charles of the Ritz Ltd (1988) 15 NSWLR 158 Tivo Inc v Vivo International Corp Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 252 UCP Gen Pharma AG v Mesoblast Inc (2012) 95 IPR 562; [2012] FCA 210 Unilever Australia Ltd v Karounos (2001) 113 FCR 322 Winton Shire Council v Lomas (2002) 119 FCR 416 Woolly Bull Enterprises Pty Ltd v Reynolds (2001) 107 FCR 166 Davison M J and Horak I, Shanahan's Australian Law of Trade Marks and Passing Off (5th ed, Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited, 2012) Lahore J W, Patents, Trade Marks & Related Rights (LexisNexis Butterworths, 2006) The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate