Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Luck v Secretary, Department of Human Services (No 4) [2016] FCA 950 Appeal from: Luck v Department of Human Services (2010) 51 AAR 265; [2010] AATA 6
File number: VID 65 of 2010
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 15 August 2016
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – in 2009, applicant requested from first respondent provision of certain documents under Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) – unsatisfied with outcome, applicant lodged application for review of decision in Administrative Appeals Tribunal – first respondent alleged that AAT lacked jurisdiction to deal with decision of which review was sought – AAT sought clarification from applicant as to decision of which review was sought – AAT convened hearing for purpose of ventilating question of its jurisdiction – first respondent did not lodge documents contemplated by s 37(1)(b) of Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) prior to jurisdictional hearing – applicant sought adjournment or stay of jurisdictional hearing including for reasons of ill health – AAT declined to adjourn or stay jurisdictional hearing, sent transcript to applicant, invited submissions – AAT held that it lacked jurisdiction to review decision of which applicant sought review – whether AAT erred in holding that it lacked jurisdiction – AAT did not err – consideration of whether AAT erred in failing to require first respondent to provide s 37(1)(b) documents – AAT did not err – consideration of whether in failing to stay or adjourn jurisdictional hearing, AAT and Deputy President constituting AAT failed to afford procedural fairness to applicant – applicant not denied procedural fairness – appeal dismissed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate