Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Haque v Jabella Group Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 962 Appeal from: Application for extension of time and leave to appeal: Haque v Jabella Group Pty Ltd & Anor [2016] FCCA 147
File number: NSD 340 of 2016
Judge: BROMWICH J
Date of judgment: 18 August 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time and leave to appeal – where appeal has no prospect of success – application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth), rr 13.10(b), 13.10(c) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 24(1A) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 35.13, 36.01
Cases cited: Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 SZTRY v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 86
Date of hearing: 9 June 2016
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Employment & Industrial Relations
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 40
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Solicitor for the Respondents: Mr J Mattson, Bartier Perry
ORDERS NSD 340 of 2016
BETWEEN: AKM AZMERUL HAQUE Applicant
AND: JABELLA GROUP PTY LTD First Respondent
JASON BAKER Second Respondent
JUDGE: BROMWICH J DATE OF ORDER: 18 AUGUST 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for an extension of time and for leave to appeal be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondents' costs as taxed or agreed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate