Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Coshott v Coshott [2016] FCA 966 Review of: Coshott v Coshott (Federal Court of Australia, NSD 1412 of 2009, Registrar's Determination dated 16 May 2016)
File number: NSD 1412 of 2009
Judge: BROMWICH J
Date of judgment: 21 December 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application under s 35A(5) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) for review of Registrar's determination of remuneration of statutory trustees for sale – associated challenge to power of primary judge to make orders delegating power to Registrar to make determination of remuneration for trustees for sale – de novo review of Registrar's determination in Federal Court – where applicants for review did not participate at the hearing of the determination before the Registrar or put on any evidence or written submissions – where applicants sought second referral for second determination – held: application dismissed with costs
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 30 Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), ss 66F(2)(a), 66G, 66G(3)(a) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), ss 79, 135, 136 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 23, 35A(5), 35A(6) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), ss 79, 80
Cases cited: Australian Coal & Shale Employees' Federation v The Commonwealth (1953) 94 CLR 621 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Letten (No 23) [2014] FCA 985 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Letten (No 25) [2016] FCA 1127 Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Re Richstar Enterprises Pty Ltd (ACN 099 071 968) v Carey (No 5) [2006] FCA 684; (2006) 58 ACSR 6 Bass v Permanent Trustee Company Limited [1999] HCA 9; (1999) 198 CLR 334 Coshott v Prentice [2014] FCAFC 88; (2014) 221 FCR 450 Doolan v Dare [2004] FCA 682; (2004) 2 ABC(NS) 16 Harris v Caladine (1991) 172 CLR 84 Ide v Ide [2004] NSWSC 751; (2004) 184 FLR 44 In the matter of Idyllic Solutions Pty Ltd as trustee for Super Save Superannuation Fund and others [2016] NSWSC 1292 Jackson v Sterling Industries Limited (1987) 162 CLR 612 Mohamed v Hurstville Tower Medical Clinic Pty Ltd (in liq) [2006] NSWSC 4 Pantzer v Wenkart [2006] FCAFC 140; (2006) 153 FCR 466 Re Macks; Ex parte Saint [2000] HCA 62; (2000) 204 CLR 158 Schweppes' Ltd v Archer (1934) 34 SR (NSW) 178 Templeton v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2015] FCAFC 137; (2015) 108 ACSR 545 Wenkart v Pantzer [2005] FCA 1572; (2005) 223 ALR 384 West International Pty Ltd v Ultradrilling Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 1443; (2008) 68 ACSR 108
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate