Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Oztech Pty Ltd v Public Trustee of Queensland (No 10) [2016] FCA 970 File number: NSD 937 of 2014
Judge: YATES J
Date of judgment: 18 August 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – notice to produce documents in affidavit – whether documents are "mentioned" in the affidavit – whether the documents have an apparent relevant to the questions in issue PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – notice to produce – where party seeks documents produced on discovery in unredacted form – where an agreed discovery protocol provides that a party is entitled to redact documents on the basis of relevance and confidentiality – whether there is reason to go behind the agreement PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – notice to produce – documents redacted for confidentiality – whether claims can be sustained
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 rr 20.14, 20.31, 30.28
Cases cited: Associated Dominions Assurance Society Pty Ltd v John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd (1955) 72 WN (NSW) 250 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australialink Pty Ltd (2009) 177 FCR 35; [2009] FCA 265 Campaign Master (UK) Ltd v Forty Two International Pty Ltd (No 4) (2010) 269 ALR 76; [2010] FCA 398 Cheung Kong Infrastructure Holdings Limited v BlueScope Steel Limited [2010] FCA 739 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 61 CSL Ltd v Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd (2010) 87 IPR 134; [2010] FCA 671 Egglishaw v Australian Crime Commission (No 2) (2009) 253 ALR 354; [2009] FCA 12 GE Capital Corporate Finance Group Ltd v Bankers Trust Co [1995] 1 WLR 172 Gloucester Shire Council v Fitch Ratings, Inc [2016] FCA 587 King v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd [2001] FCA 1487 Selth v Australasian Barrister Chambers Pty Limited (No 2) [2016] FCA 46 Seven Network Limited v News Limited (No 11) [2006] FCA 174 Sunland Waterfront (BVI) Ltd v Prudentia Investments Pty Ltd (No 4) [2010] FCA 863 Trade Practices Commission v Arnotts Limited (1989) 88 ALR 90; [1989] FCA 340 Welker v Rinehart [2012] NSWSC 588 Wong v Sklavos (2014) 319 ALR 378; [2014] FCAFC 120
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate