Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Curtis-Smith v Secretary, Department of Social Services (No 2) [2016] FCA 975 Appeal from: Curtis-Smith and Secretary, Department of Social Services [2015] AATA 152
File number(s): NSD 650 of 2015
Judge(s): BUCHANAN J
Date of judgment: 18 August 2016
Catchwords: COSTS – application for lump sum costs after judgment – no reason to depart from assessment/taxation procedures provided by the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), s 44 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 43(3)(a), 43(3)(d) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 40.02, 40.12
Cases cited: Cameron v Secretary, Department of Human Services (No 2) [2015] FCA 1201 Curtis-Smith v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2015] FCA 1115
Date of hearing: 17 August 2016
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant did not appear
Solicitor for the Respondent: S Thompson of Sparke Helmore Lawyers
ORDERS NSD 650 of 2015
BETWEEN: JAMES CURTIS-SMITH Appellant
AND: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES Respondent
JUDGE: BUCHANAN J DATE OF ORDER: 17 AUGUST 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The interlocutory application filed on 7 July 2016 is dismissed. 2. There be no order as to costs of the interlocutory application. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate