Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 981 File number: VID 561 of 2016
Judge: MOSHINSKY J
Date of judgment: 17 August 2016
Legislation: Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001, rr 13.03C(1)(c), 16.05 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Sch 2, cl 485.215
Cases cited: Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen (1984) 3 FCR 344 Singh v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 1652 SZTRY v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 86
Date of hearing: 17 August 2016
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 19
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person with the assistance of an interpreter
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr T Smyth
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The second respondent filed a submitting appearance, save as to costs
ORDERS VID 561 of 2016
BETWEEN: SARBJEET SINGH Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: MOSHINSKY J DATE OF ORDER: 17 AUGUST 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for an extension of time and leave to appeal be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the first respondent's costs of the application. 3. The name of the second respondent be changed to Administrative Appeals Tribunal. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate