Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
ABL Nominees Pty Ltd v Trinick (Trustee) [2016] FCA 996 File number: SAD 379 of 2015
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 22 August 2016
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – application by creditor to set aside or terminate a personal insolvency agreement – whether applicants are creditors with standing to bring application – where applicants have not lodged proof of debts – where applicants are assignees of debts – Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss 222, 222C BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY –whether certain creditors should have been admitted to vote on personal insolvency agreement special resolution – where applicants were only admitted to vote collectively for value of $1 – where applicants voted against personal insolvency agreement – whether applicants should have been admitted to vote for the full face value of their debts – consideration of entitlement to vote on assigned debts – whether assignee must prove the value of consideration given for assigned debt – Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss 64D, 64ZA, 64ZB BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – whether there is a reason personal insolvency agreement should be set aside – whether trustee adequately investigated debtor's affairs and provided proper advice to creditors – whether trustee acted impartially – where potential undervalued transactions and transfers to defeat creditors – Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss 222, 222C BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – whether personal insolvency agreement complied with requirements of Part X – whether special resolution specified provisions to be included in personal insolvency agreement – whether there are material differences between proposed personal insolvency agreement and executed personal insolvency agreement – Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 188A
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate