Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited [2016] FCA 1020 File number: NSD 724 of 2016
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 24 August 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – representative proceeding – application for injunction restraining respondent from communicating with group members – application for Court approval of protocol for communication with group members
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Sch 2 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 33V, 33X and 33ZF
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Richards [2013] FCAFC 89 Courtney v Medtel Pty Limited (2002) 122 FCR 168 King v AG Australia Holdings Ltd [2002] FCA 1560
Date of hearing: 3 August 2016
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 44
Counsel for the Lead Applicant: Dr P Cashman with Mr R White and Mr P Bates
Solicitor for the Lead Applicant: Bannister Law
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr C Scerri QC with Ms K Anderson
Solicitor for the Respondent: Allens
ORDERS NSD 724 of 2016
BETWEEN: BILJANA CAPIC Lead Applicant
AND: FORD MOTOR COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA LIMITED Respondent
JUDGE: PERRAM J DATE OF ORDER: 24 AUGUST 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The interlocutory application be dismissed. 2. The lead applicant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate