Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Intervet International B.V. v Merial Inc [2016] FCA 1030 Appeal from: Merial, Inc v Intervet International B.V. (Federal Court of Australia, VID 399 of 2015, 16 August 2016)
File number: VID 980 of 2016
Judge: MIDDLETON J
Date of judgment: 24 August 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – witnesses – video link – application for evidence to be given by – Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 47A – whether party required to make out case for use of video link – cross-examination – overarching purpose of civil litigation – Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37(M)(1), (2), (3), (4).
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) Evidence (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1958 (Vic) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Patents Act 1990 (Cth)
Cases cited: Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v StoresOnline International Inc [2009] FCA 717 Blackrock Asset Management Australia Services Limited v Waked (No 2) [2011] FCA 479 Campaign Master (UK) Ltd v Forty Two International Pty Ltd (No 3) (2009) 181 FCR 152 Corrigan v Commvault Systems (Aust) Pty Ltd (2011) 192 FCR 71 Decor Corp Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2015) 231 FCR 531 House v R (1936) 55 CLR 499 Neimann v Electronic Industries Ltd [1978] VR 431
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate