Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BEJ15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1033 Appeal from: BEJ15 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 25
File number: QUD 82 of 2016
Judge: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 26 August 2016
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit Court dismissing an application for judicial review of a Refugee Review Tribunal decision – whether the Federal Circuit Court erred in failing to find the Tribunal's decision was affected by jurisdictional error – whether the Federal Circuit Court took into account an incorrect and misleading representation or submission made by counsel for the Minister – whether the Federal Circuit Court failed to take into account a relevant consideration PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application to adduce evidence on appeal – whether the appellant could show, with reasonable diligence, that the evidence could not be adduced at trial – whether the evidence was such that very probably the result would have been different
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Cases cited: Abebe v Commonwealth (1999) 197 CLR 510; [1999] HCA 14 ACC15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 97 BEJ15 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 25 BEV15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 507 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZTQS [2015] FCA 1069 NASB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 24 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2006) 228 CLR 152; [2006] HCA 63 SZTAP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 238 FCR 404; [2015] FCAFC 175
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate