Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Duncan v AAI Limited, in the matter of Quinnco Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) [2016] FCA 1035 File number: SAD 439 of 2015
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 26 August 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to transfer proceedings from South Australia District Registry to Queensland District Registry – where proceedings concern alleged damage to property located in Queensland – where possible need for experts to inspect property – where the Court may benefit from a view of the property – where majority of witnesses relevant to matters most likely to be subject of serious dispute are located in Queensland – where applicants reside in South Australia and respondent is a company registered in Queensland – where application made at a relatively early stage of proceedings – Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 48 – Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 2.02 Held: Transfer order made.
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 48 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 2.02
Cases cited: Harcourts WA Pty Ltd v Roy Weston Nominees Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1383 Mortimer v Opes Prime Stockbroking Ltd (ACN 086 294 028) (Administrators Appointed) (In Liq) [2009] FCA 227 National Mutual Holdings Pty Ltd and Others v The Sentry Corporation and Another (1988) 19 FCR 155 Wepar Nominees Pty Ltd v Schofield [2013] FCA 920
Date of hearing: 8 July 2016
Registry: South Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate