Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ceric v Prosegur Australia Pty Limited [2016] FCA 1068 Appeal from: Ceric and Prosegur Australia Pty Ltd (Compensation) [2015] AATA 590
File number: NSD 1089 of 2015
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 7 September 2016
Catchwords: WORKERS' COMPENSATION – compensation for injuries resulting in incapacity ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal from Administrative Appeals Tribunal – whether there was evidence before the Tribunal capable of supporting finding of fact
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 33(1)(c) and 44 Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) ss 4(10A), 5A(1), 14(1), 16 and 19
Cases cited: Attorney-General (Vic) v Andrews (2007) 230 CLR 369 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Bell v Commissioner of Taxation [2012] FCA 1042 Bushell v Repatriation Commission (1992) 175 CLR 408 Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 280 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shang Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Sullivan v Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2013] FCA 1362 VWBF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2006) 154 FCR 302 Watts v Rake (1960) 108 CLR 158
Date of hearing: 6 July 2016
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate