Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Voxson Pty Limited v Telstra Corporation Limited (No 5) [2016] FCA 1097 File number: NSD 2436 of 2013
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 8 September 2016
Cases cited: Rafferty v Time 2000 West Pty Limited (No.3) (2009) 257 ALR 503
Date of hearing: 30 August 2016
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Patents and associated Statutes
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 14
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr D Shavin QC
Solicitor for the Applicant: DibbsBarker
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr N Murray
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
Counsel for the Third and Sixth Respondents: Mr A Lang
Solicitor for the Third and Sixth Respondents: Baker & McKenzie
Solicitor for the Fifth Respondent: Mr P Kerr of Allens
ORDERS NSD 2436 of 2013
BETWEEN: VOXSON PTY LIMITED Applicant
AND: TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED First Respondent
OPTUS MOBILE PTY LIMITED Third Respondent
VODAFONE HUTCHISON AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED Fifth Respondent
OPTUS NETWORKS PTY LIMITED Sixth Respondent
JUDGE: PERRAM J DATE OF ORDER: 8 SEPTEMBER 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The parties bring in short minutes of order by 13 September 2016 to give effect to these reasons. 2. The matter be listed for further directions on 15 November 2016 at 9.30am. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate