Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hartnett Legal Services Pty Ltd v Ballantyne [2016] FCA 1116 Appeal from: Ballantyne v Hartnett Legal Services Pty Ltd (Federal Circuit Court of Australia, No BRG1105/2014, Order dated 1 August 2016)
File number: QUD 631 of 2016
Judge: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 26 August 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal – whether substantial injustice would result if leave refused– construction of rule 14.02 of the Federal Circuit Court Rules – scope of order for discovery – no substantial injustice – application dismissed
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 (Cth) ss 3 and 45 Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth) rr 1.03, 1.05, 14.02, 14.04, 14.06 and Div 14.2 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 20.14
Cases cited: Abrahams v Qantas Airways Limited (No 2) (2007) 210 FLR 314 Compagnie Financiere et Commerciale du Pacifique v Peruvian Guano Company (1882) 11 QBD 55 Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Director of the Fair Work Building Inspectorate v CFMEU [2016] FCCA 1569 Hartnett Legal Services Pty Ltd v Ballantyne (2015) 236 FCR 535 Minogue v Williams [2000] FCA 125
Date of hearing: 26 August 2016
Registry: Queensland
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Employment & Industrial Relations
Category: Catchwords
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate