Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Psevdos v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2016] FCA 1118 Appeal from: Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Psevdos [2016] FCCA 1480
File number(s): SAD 193 of 2016
Judge(s): CHARLESWORTH J
Date of judgment: 1 September 2016
Catchwords: HIGH COURT AND FEDERAL COURT – Federal Court – Powers and discretion of Federal Court – Leave to adduce further evidence on appeal under s 27 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – Principles for adducing further evidence – Procedure on an application to adduce further evidence under r 36.57 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – Where leave sought to issue subpoenas to obtain further evidence
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 60 Evidence Act 1929 (SA) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 27 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 36.57 Supreme Court Civil Rules 2006 (SA)
Cases cited: CDJ v VAJ (1998) 197 CLR 172 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Psevdos [2015] SASC 66 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Psevdos [2016] FCCA 1480 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1 Psevdos v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2016] FCA 844 Psevdos v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2016] FCCA 978 Shannon v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (2014) 318 ALR 420 Water Conservation and Irrigation Commission (NSW) v Browning (1947) 74 CLR 492 Watson v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority and Others (2012) 206 FCR 365 Wren v Mahony (1972) 126 CLR 212
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate