Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
CQMS Pty Ltd v Bradken Resources Pty Limited (No 2) [2016] FCA 1144
File number: QUD 736 of 2013
Judge: DOWSETT J
Date of judgment: 6 September 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – form of orders – appropriate relief where respondent's product found not to infringe patent COSTS – patent law – where applicant made unjustified threats – where expert evidence prepared and not relied on
Date of hearing: 6 September 2016
Registry: Queensland
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Patents and associated Statutes
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 16
Counsel for the First and Second Applicants: A Webb SC
Solicitor for the First and Second Applicants: B Coogan of Thomson Geer
Counsel for the First Respondent: D Shavin QC with P Flynn
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Jones Day
Table of Corrections
20 September 2016 The date of judgment and date of hearing on the cover page have been amended to 6 September 2016.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT QUD 736 of 2013
BETWEEN: CQMS PTY LTD ACN 122 935 906 First Applicant
CQMS RAZER PTY LTD ACN 010 402 990 Second Applicant
AND: BRADKEN RESOURCES PTY LIMITED ACN 098 300 988 First Respondent
BRADKEN LIMITED ACN 108 693 009 Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate