Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Oztech Pty Ltd v Public Trustee of Queensland (No 14) [2016] FCA 1162 File number: NSD 937 of 2014
Judge: YATES J
Date of judgment: 28 September 2016
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – documentary tender – relevance – whether probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice – whether tendered for a tendency purpose
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 95, 97, 99, 100, 135, Pt 3.6
Cases cited: Allam v Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd (2012) 95 IPR 242; [2012] FCAFC 34 Combined Insurance Company of America trading as Combined Insurance Company of Australia v Trifunovski (No 4) [2011] FCA 271 Cubillo v Commonwealth (No 2) (2000) 103 FCR 1; [2000] FCA 1084
Odgers S, Uniform Evidence Law (12th ed, Thomson Reuters, 2016)
Date of hearing: 22, 23 September 2016
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 19
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr RPL Lancaster SC with Mr CH Withers, Mr AM Hochroth and Mr RJ May
Solicitor for the Applicant: Squire Patton Boggs
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr W Sofronoff QC with Mr DB O'Sullivan QC, Mr MJ O'Meara, Mr JP O'Regan, Ms E Hoiberg and Ms F Lubett
Solicitor for the Respondent: Clayton Utz
ORDERS NSD 937 of 2014
BETWEEN: OZTECH PTY LTD ACN 005 907 871 Applicant
AND: THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF QUEENSLAND Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate