Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Perkiss v State of New South Wales (Technical and Further Education Commission) (TAFE Illawarra) [2016] FCA 1165 Appeal from: Perkiss v State of New South Wales (Technical and Further Education Commission) (TAFE Illawarra) [2016] FCCA 957
File number: NSD 768 of 2016
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 27 September 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – appeal from decision of Federal Circuit Court dismissing application for a maximum costs order under r 21.03 of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth) – whether primary judge failed to take into account relevant considerations and applied wrong legal principles – House v The King principles – time extended and leave to appeal granted but appeal dismissed with costs.
Legislation: Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) Disability Standards for Education 2005 (Cth) Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth)
Cases cited: Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc [1991] FCA 655; 33 FCR 397 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Hudson v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2016] FCCA 917 Hurst v Queensland [2006] FCAFC 100; 151 FCR 562 MZZMQ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 557 Perkiss v State of New South Wales (Technical and Further Education Commission) (TAFE Illawarra) [2016] FCCA 957 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2011] FCAFC 156; 217 FCR 238
Date of hearing: 27 September 2016
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate