Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZTVG v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1172 Appeal from: SZTVG v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 616
File number: NSD 511 of 2016
Judge: BURLEY J
Date of judgment: 30 September 2016
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for a Protection (Class XA) Visa on basis of appellant's perceived association with LTTE, actual or imputed political opinion due to Tamil ethnicity and because appellant departed Sri Lanka illegally seeking asylum – refusal by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection – review of the delegate's decision by the Refugee Review Tribunal – dismissal by Refugee Review Tribunal on basis that appellant was not credible and there was no a real chance appellant would be persecuted on return to Sri Lanka – application for judicial review in Federal Circuit Court of Australia – appeal from primary judge's dismissal of application – whether Refugee Review Tribunal engaged in jurisdictional error by misunderstanding appellant's claims – whether Refugee Review Tribunal failed to put country information relating to persons being held on remand on return to Sri Lanka to appellant – whether appellant had opportunity to present arguments in accordance with Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 425 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – role of the Court to decide whether decision was invalid by reason of jurisdictional error – role of the Court not to consider factual merits of Refugee Review Tribunal's decision
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36, 412, 415, 422B, 424, 424AA, 424A, 425 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) cl 866.211
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate