Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Young v Hughes Trueman Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 1176 Appeal from: Application for extension of time: Young v Hughes Trueman Pty Ltd & Anor [2016] FCCA 989
File number: NSD 920 of 2016
Judge: BROMWICH J
Date of judgment: 30 September 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time to file notice of appeal against refusal to set aside bankruptcy notice – where factual substratum of application is fallacious allegation of conspiracy – where no evidence to support factual or legal foundation for counter-claim, set-off or cross demand under s 40(1)(g) of Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) or conspiracy – application dismissed with costs
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 40(1)(g) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 36.03(a)(i), 36.05(3)
Cases cited: ALA15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 30 Attwells v Jackson Lalic Lawyers Pty Ltd [2016] HCA 16; (2016) 331 ALR 1 AXQ15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 73 D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid [2005] HCA 12; (2005) 223 CLR 1 Johnson v Johnson [2000] HCA 48; 201 CLR 488 Margo Young v Brian Keith Hones & Ors [2015] HCASL 73 SZTRY v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 86 Young v Hones [2014] NSWCA 337 Young v Hones (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 1429 Young v King (No 9) [2016] NSWLEC 4 Young v King (No 8) [2015] NSWLEC 187 Young v King (No 6) [2015] NSWLEC 111 Young v King [2004] NSWLEC 93
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate