Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mackay Sugar Limited v Wilmar Sugar Australia Limited (No 2) [2016] FCA 1179 File number(s): QUD 449 of 2016
Judge(s): GREENWOOD J
Date of judgment: 3 October 2016
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – consideration of an application for a declaration that a resolution making amendments to the Constitution of Queensland Sugar Limited ("QSL") are not oppressive to, unfairly prejudicial to or unfairly discriminatory against particular members of QSL, for the purposes of s 232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 232
Cases cited: Wilmar Sugar Australia Limited v Queensland Sugar Limited (No 2) [2016] FCA 180 Wayde v New South Wales Rugby League Limited (1985) 180 CLR 459
Date of hearing: 29 and 30 August 2016
Date of last submissions: 30 August 2016
Registry: Queensland
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Economic Regulator, Competition and Access
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 115
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr M Hodge and Ms F Lubett
Solicitor for the Applicants: McCullough Robertson
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr J Giles SC and Mr S Fitzpatrick
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Minter Ellison
ORDERS QUD 449 of 2016
BETWEEN: MACKAY SUGAR LIMITED ACN 090 152 211 (and others named in the Schedule) First Applicant
AND: WILMAR SUGAR AUSTRALIA LIMITED ACN 098 999 985 (and others named in the Schedule) First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate