Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hudson v Sigalla [2016] FCA 1204 Appeal from: Hudson v Sigalla (No.3) [2016] FCCA 2140
File number: NSD 1605 of 2016
Judge: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 28 November 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — whether leave required to appeal from judgment of Federal Circuit Court varying order for costs in favour of successful party by substituting order for costs in a lump sum to be paid to successful party's lawyers — whether judgment final or interlocutory — whether leave to appeal should be granted
Legislation: Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth) rr 1.05, 16.05(3), 16.07, 21.02 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 24(1A), 43 Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) O 36 r 2, O 62 r 4(2)(c) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 18.01, 39.31(1)(d), 40.02, 40.20
Cases cited: Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Phillip Morris Inc (1981) 148 CLR 170 Akki Pty Ltd v Martin Hall Pty Ltd (1994) 35 NSWLR 470 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Shell Co of Australia Ltd (1997) 72 FCR 386 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Yandal Gold [2003] FCA 77 Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (No 2) (1995) 57 FCR 119 Bienstein v Bienstein [2003] HCA 7; 195 ALR 225 Caboolture Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd (in liq) v White Industries (Qld) Pty Ltd (1993) 45 FCR 224 Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Dunstan v Seymour [2006] FCA 917 Ex parte Bucknell (1936) 56 CLR 221 Ginos Engineers Pty Ltd v Autodesk Australia Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 1051 Hacker v Weston [2015] FCA 790 Hall v Nominal Defendant (1966) 117 CLR 423 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Hudson v Sigalla (No.3) [2016] FCCA 2140 Hudson v Sigalla [2015] FCAFC 140 In the Estate of Fuld (No 4) [1968] P 727 Lenijamar Pty Ltd v AGC (Advances) Ltd (1990) 27 FCR 388 Les Laboratoires Servier v Apotex Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 27 Probiotec Ltd v The University of Melbourne (2008) 166 FCR 30 Salfinger v Niugini Mining (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 5) [2008] FCA 1119 Short v Crawley (No 45) [2013] NSWSC 1541 Smith v Cowell (1880) 6 QBD 75 Younan v Queensland Building Services Authority [2011] QCA 1
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate