Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kadam v MiiResorts Group 1 Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 1205 File number: QUD 528 of 2016
Judge: EDELMAN J
Date of judgment: 10 October 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application by non-party to be joined as an applicant – application opposed by existing applicants – scope of r 9.05 of Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – scope of general power in r 1.32 – discretionary considerations
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.31, 1.32, 1.33, 9.05, 9.05(a), 9.05(b)(i), 9.05(b)(ii), 9.05(b)(iii), 9.12, 9.12(3) Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) Or 6 r 8 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992
Cases cited: Commerzbank Aktiengesellschaft v Morgan [2004] EWHC 2771 (Ch) Dauguet v Centrelink [2015] FCA 395 Grant v BHP Coal Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 329 McAlister v State of New South Wales [2014] FCA 702; (2014) 223 FCR 1 News Ltd v Australian Rugby Football League Ltd [1996] FCA 870; (1996) 64 FCR 410 Pegang Mining Co Ltd v Choong Sam [1969] 2 MLJ 52 Sensis Pty Ltd v Bivami Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1365 State of Victoria v Sutton [1998] HCA 56; (1998) 195 CLR 291
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate