Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
HC Foods Pty Ltd v Carmichael [2016] FCA 1214 File number: WAD 129 of 2016
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 11 October 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – pre-action discovery application – whether the applicant reasonably believes it may have a right to obtain relief in accordance with r 7.23 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 183(1) Federal Court Rules 1979 O 15A r 6 Federal Court Rules 2011 rr 6, 7.23, 7.23(1), 7.23(1)(a), 7.23(1)(b), 7.25, 20.17
Cases cited: Bonham v Iluka Resources Limited [2015] FCA 713 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Orica Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 592 Optiver Australia Pty Ltd v Tibra Trading Pty Ltd (2008) 169 FCR 435 Paxus Services Ltd v People Bank Pty Ltd (1990) 99 ALR 728 Pet Tech Pty Ltd v Batson [2013] NSWSC 1954 Sandhurst Trustees Limited v Clarke [2015] FCAFC 21 St George Bank Ltd v Rabo Australia Ltd (2004) 211 ALR 147
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Registry: Western Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Employment & Industrial Relations
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 49
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate