Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
CLI15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1223 Appeal from: CLI15 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 650
File number: NSD 499 of 2016
Judge: BURLEY J
Date of judgment: 14 October 2016
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Circuit Court of Australia dismissing an application for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – Tribunal affirmed decision not to grant the appellant a Protection (Class XA) visa – whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal failed to comply with ss 424A and 424AA of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal failed to consider fully the complementary protection obligations owed to the appellant ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – role of the Court to decide whether decision was invalid by reason of jurisdictional error – role of the Court not to consider factual merits of Tribunal's decision
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36, 424A and 424AA
Cases cited: CLI15 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 650 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZGUR (2011) 241 CLR 594 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIAI [2009] HCA 39; (2009) 83 ALJR 1123 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZQRB (2013) 210 FCR 505 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559 SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] HCA 26; (2007) 235 ALR 609 SZMCD v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2009) 174 FCR 415 SZTMC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1282 VAF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 236 FCR 549
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate