Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Jones v AAI Limited trading as Vero Insurance [2016] FCA 1244 File number: TAD 3 of 2016
Judge: ALLSOP CJ
Date of judgment: 25 October 2016
Catchwords: EQUITY – Where family arrangement agreed and acted upon – Where enforceable equitable interests have been created – Whether the subsequent signing of a written record had the effect of altering or affecting the nature of those interests and the relative entitlement to relief INSURANCE – General Insurance – Application pursuant to Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) s51 – Claim against insurer in respect of liability of insured – Solicitor insured maintained professional indemnity cover under relevant master policy scheme for Tasmanian solicitors – Claim brought against solicitor's estate for damages for alleged breach of contractual and tortious duties NEGLIGENCE – Whether solicitor breached contractual and tortious duties to act with requisite degree of skill and care expected of a reasonably competent solicitor – Where solicitor retained to draft a written record of a pre-existing family arrangement – Consideration of the scope of the retainer – Whether solicitor failed to provide a minimum level of necessary advice – Whether written record had the effect of altering the position of the parties, to the detriment of the interests of the applicants
Legislation: Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) s51
Cases cited: David v David [2009] NSWCA 8 Delaforce v Simpson-Cook [2010] NSWCA 84; 78 NSWLR 483 Dominic v Riz [2009] NSWCA 216 Equuscorp Pty Ltd v Glengallan Investments [2004] HCA 55; 218 CLR 471 Giumelli v Giumelli [1999] HCA 10; 196 CLR 101 Malsbury v Malsbury [1982] 1 NSWLR 226 Muschinski v Dodds [1985] HCA 78; 160 CLR 583
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate