Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Head Quarters (WA) Pty Ltd (Trustee) v Mubarakai [2016] FCA 1254 File number(s): QUD 179 of 2016
Judge(s): JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 18 October 2016
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – legal professional privilege – annexure to affidavit mistakenly included communications between solicitor and client – affidavit tendered – inadvertent disclosure - obvious from strike through that email not intended to be part of affidavit – no waiver of legal professional privilege
Cases cited: Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Limited v Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Limited [2013] HCA 46; (2013) 250 CLR 303
Date of hearing: 18 October 2016
Registry: Queensland
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 5
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr C Crawford
Solicitor for the Applicant: Rouse Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr B Grubb with Mr G Metaxas
Solicitor for the Respondents: Metaxas & Hager
ORDERS QUD 179 of 2016
BETWEEN: HEAD QUARTERS (WA) PTY LTD AS TRUSTEE FOR THE THREE FLIGHTS UP UNIT TRUST Applicant
AND: JERESTINE SHAHYAZ MUBARAKAI First Respondent
VICTORIA VENTURES PTY LTD AS TRUSTEE FOR THE VICTORIA VENTURES UNIT TRUST Second Respondent
JUDGE: JAGOT J DATE OF ORDER: 18 OCTOBER 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The email from the applicant to his solicitor be removed from evidence on the basis that legal professional privilege over that document has not been waived. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate