Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Titan Enterprises (Qld) Pty Ltd v Cross [2016] FCA 1275 File number: QUD 411 of 2016
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 31 October 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Costs – subpoenas – production of documents by non-party – privilege asserted – privilege claim not made out on facts – whether entitled to expenses – whether expenses include legal costs – whether costs should follow the event – Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 24.22
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43 Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) s 229 Senior Courts Act 1981 (UK) s 51 Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) (repealed) O 27 r 4A, O 27 r 11 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 24.22 Civil Procedures Rules 1998 (Eng & W) r 34
Cases cited: Akiba v Queensland (2010) 184 FCR 406 Bank of New South Wales v Withers (1981) 35 ALR 21 Cachia v Hanes (1994) 179 CLR 403 Charlick Trading Pty Ltd v Australian National Railways Commission (1997) 149 ALR 647 Dormeuil Trade Mark [1983] RPC 131 Fuelxpress Ltd v M Ericsson Pty Ltd (1987) 75 ALR 284 Hadid v Lenfest Communications Inc (1996) 65 FCR 350 Individual Homes Ltd v Macbream Investments Ltd, (2002) 99(46) L.S.G. 32; The Times, 14 November 2002 Packer v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (Qld) [ 1985 ] 1 Qd R 275 Titan Enterprises (Qld) Pty Ltd v Cross [2016] FCA 1241 Tyne v UBS AG (No 2) [2014] FCA 1228 Waind v Hill and National Employers' Mutual General Association Ltd [1978] 1 NSWLR 372
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate