Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Stevens v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1280 File number: SAD 164 of 2016
Judge: CHARLESWORTH J
Date of judgment: 2 November 2016
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — statute preventing applicant for judicial review obtaining all documents taken into account by administrative decision-maker — applicant for review unable to discharge onus of demonstrating certain grounds for judicial review without reference to the withheld materials — practical implications for court exercising powers on judicial review MIGRATION — cancellation of visa under s 501(3) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – state of mind required by Minister — differences between powers conferred under s 501(2) and s 501(3) — whether Minister was required to consider certain statutory consequences of the cancellation decision — whether Minister required to assess seriousness of visa holder's past offending — whether Minister required to consider risk of harm posed by visa holder to the Australian community — whether Minister's decision affected by legal unreasonableness — allegation of legal unreasonableness to be assessed in a statutory context where Minister required to form a reasonable suspicion that the visa holder did not pass the character test — Minister not required to form positive state of satisfaction that visa holder did not pass the character test — implications for the ultimate exercise of the Minister's discretion
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 20(1A) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B(1) Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 424A, 430, 496, 501, 501A, 501C, 501G, 503A, 503C
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate