Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ghosh v Miller [2016] FCA 1293 Appeal from: Miller v Ghosh (No 3) [2016] FCCA 2491
File number: NSD 1735 of 2016
Judge: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 2 November 2016
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – application for suspension of the operation of a sequestration order pending determination of applicant's appeal and for annulment of applicant's bankruptcy – whether arguable case on appeal — whether balance of convenience favours the making of the orders.
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 44, 44(1)(a), 44(1)(b) 49, 52, 52(2)(a), 52(3), 60, 60(2), 60(3), 60(4), 116(2)(g), 153B Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 26, 29 Federal Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 2016 r 7.03 Federal Court Rules 2011 r 36.08
Cases cited: Alfio Peter Bulic v Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd [2007] FCA 307 Clapham v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2013] FCAFC 84 Evans v The Heather Thiedeke Group Pty Ltd (1990) 95 ALR 424 Investec Australia Finance Pty Limited v Naude [2016] FCA 731 James v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2015] FCA 582 Lane Rowin Pty Ltd v Perovich [2007] FMCA 1429 Nolten v Groeneveld Australia Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1494 Re Ronald Grafton Sarina v Council of the Shire of Wollondilly (1980) 32 ALR 596 Re Schmidt; ex parte Anglewood Pty Ltd (1968) 13 FLR 111
Date of hearing: 25 October 2016
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate