Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Manhattan (Asia) Limited v Dymocks Franchise Systems (China) Limited (No 2) [2016] FCA 1323 File number: NSD 1612 of 2012
Judge: FARRELL J
Date of judgment: 8 November 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application by respondent under s 56(4) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) and r 19.01(1)(c) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) to dismiss proceedings based on applicant's failure to pay security for costs – order for security for costs made December 2014 – directors of the applicant declared bankrupt – applicant to be dissolved in December 2016 – application granted
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 56(4) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 19.01(1)(c)
Cases cited: Austcorp Project No. 20 Pty Limited v The Trust Co (PTAL) Limited, in the matter of Bellpac Pty Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (in liq) (No 4) [2015] FCA 850 Manhattan (Asia) Limited v Dymocks Franchise Systems (China) Limited [2014] FCA 1143
Date of hearing: 8 November 2016
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Category: Catchwords
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate