Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Calimoso v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1335 Appeal from: Calimoso v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCCA 1492
File number: SAD 191 of 2016
Judge: CHARLESWORTH J
Date of judgment: 11 November 2016
Catchwords: STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – words and phrases – "at the end of the day" MIGRATION – meaning and effect of s 494C(5) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) COMMUNICATIONS LAW – electronic communications – deemed date of receipt of document transmitted by email
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth), s 36 Electronic Transactions Act 1999 (Cth) Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 5, 14, 38B, 65, 66, 67, 138, 332H, 338, 347, 379C, 441C, 473HD, 473HE, 494A, 494B, 494C Migration Legislation Amendment (Electronic Transactions and Methods of Notification) Act 2001 (Cth) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), rr 2.16, 4.10
Cases cited: Buck v Comcare (1996) 66 FCR 359 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 Tay v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2010) 183 FCR 163
Date of hearing: 8 November 2016
Registry: South Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 32
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr S Mitchell
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate