Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lim v Comcare [2016] FCA 1346 Appeal from: Lim v Comcare [2016] FCA 709
File number: ACD 50 of 2016
Judge: WIGNEY J
Date of judgment: 11 November 2016
Catchwords: COSTS – interlocutory application for security of costs pursuant to s 56 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) and r 36.09 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – whether the appellant has sufficient prospects of success – where the appellant has not advanced evidence of impecuniosity or financial hardship – where the appellant has not paid costs of the primary proceedings
Legislation: Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), s 44 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 24, 56 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 36.09, 36.11(1)
Cases cited: Clack v Collins (No 1) [2010] FCA 513 Comcare v Martin [2016] HCA 43 Comcare v Mooi (1996) 69 FCR 439 Dranichnikov v Centrelink [2002] FCA 1622 Equity Access Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation [1989] FCA 520 Singh v Secretary, Department of Employment and Workplace Relations [2007] FCA 90 Soh v Commonwealth of Australia [2008] FCA 1524 Tait v Bindal People [2002] FCA 322 Willoughby v Clayton [2008] WASCA 93
Date of hearing: 12 August 2016
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate