Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
MH v Australian Capital Territory [2016] FCA 1355 Appeal from: MH v Australian Capital Territory & Ors [2016] FCCA 563
File number: ACD 34 of 2016
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 16 November 2016
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW — workplace rights — action not taken by reason of exercising PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — appellable error — findings of fact
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 340(1), 340(1)(a)(i), 340(1)(b), 361, 362
Cases cited: Board of Bendigo Regional Institute of Technical and Further Education v Barclay [2012] HCA 31, (2012) 248 CLR 500 Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1833, (2001) 117 FCR 424 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Alfred [2011] FCAFC 13, (2011) 203 IR 78 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd [2014] HCA 41, (2014) 253 CLR 243 Dahler v Australian Capital Territory [2014] FCA 946 Farrington v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2002] FCA 1013, (2002) 50 ATR 429 Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22, (2003) 214 CLR 118 Kowalski v Domestic Violence Crisis Service [2005] FCA 12 MH v Australian Capital Territory & Ors [2016] FCCA 563 Robinson Helicopter Co Inc v McDermott [2016] HCA 22, (2016) 90 ALJR 679
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate