Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZUZD v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1371 File number: NSD 1135 of 2016
Judge: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 4 November 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for an extension of time to appeal a judgment of the Federal Circuit Court – length of the extension sought. Held: None of the proposed grounds of appeal reasonably arguable – application dismissed.
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 36.03, 36.05 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5J(1), 36(2)(aa), 91R, 476
Cases cited: Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng [2001] HCA 17; (2001) 205 CLR 507 SZUZD v Minister for Immigration [2016] FCCA 1883
Date of hearing: 4 November 2016
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 25
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person with the assistance of an interpreter
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr K Eskerie
Solicitor for the Respondents: Sparke Helmore
ORDERS NSD 1135 of 2016
BETWEEN: SZUZD Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: WHITE J DATE OF ORDER: 4 NOVEMBER 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for an extension of time within which to commence an appeal is dismissed. 2. The Applicant is to pay the costs of the First Respondent of an incidental to the application fixed in the sum of $2,500. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate